Home >> Current Issues
Volume No - 18 Issue No - 14
We have found that the evidence before the jury in relation to both s 23G of the 1908 Act and contamination was incorrect or misleading and, in the case of the former, some of it should not have been admitted. Those two issues are the principal focus of the judgment. Having addressed all the issues raised with us, we have stood back and considered the case in the round. We have concluded that a miscarriage of justice has occurred and accordingly we allow the appeal and quash the appellant’s convictions.