Home >> Current Issues
Volume No - 15 Issue No - 25
PW1’s evidence was simply that whilst talking to Martha, he realized that the Appellant was following him. We can safely assume from this evidence that the Appellant was at a distance when PW1was talking to Martha and could not have been privy to the Duo’s discussion. It was unsafe to convict the Appellant for the murder of deceased. We accordingly allow the appeal and set aside the conviction .Consequently, we acquit the Appellant forthwith.