Home >> Current Issues
Volume No - 15 Issue No - 25
PW1â€™s evidence was simply that whilst talking to Martha, he realized that the Appellant was following him. We can safely assume from this evidence that the Appellant was at a distance when PW1was talking to Martha and could not have been privy to the Duoâ€™s discussion. It was unsafe to convict the Appellant for the murder of deceased. We accordingly allow the appeal and set aside the conviction .Consequently, we acquit the Appellant forthwith.